Fighting against Death Penalty since 1999
Death Penalty Resources » World and death penalty » Death Penalty in Texas » DP in Texas archives » Sharon Keller - an ethic s case » Controversial execution judge to update finance data
Move comes after liberal group files ethics, criminal complaints
against Keller
By JIM VERTUNO
ASSOCIATED PRESS
March 31, 2009,
AUSTIN — The top judge on the state’s Court of Criminal Appeals will
file new personal financial disclosures to show real estate holdings
that she had left off in recent years, her attorney said on Tuesday.
A liberal watchdog group had filed ethics and criminal complaints
against Presiding Judge Sharon Keller after reports that she did not
disclose property that the Dallas Morning News reported is worth
nearly $2 million.
Texans for Public Justice filed the complaints in Austin against
Keller, a Republican, with the Texas Ethics Commission and the Travis
County attorney’s office.
“We’re going to make a corrected report,” Keller attorney Ed Shack
said. “There’s some items that need to be put on her report. The
judge met today with her father and her father’s lawyer and they are
determining what property is in her name.”
Keller is already facing misconduct charges from the state Judicial
Conduct Commission for failing to keep her office open late the night
Michael Wayne Richard was executed. His lawyers have said that
prevented them from filing an appeal. Keller has said attorneys for
Richard, who raped and murdered a woman in 1986, had other options to
appeal.
The latest complaints come after the newspaper reported that Keller’s
routine annual financial disclosures did not include the property.
Although separate from the misconduct charge, Keller’s financial
disclosures are relevant in that case. She has argued that the
misconduct charges violate her constitutional right to counsel
because the state refuses to allow attorney Chip Babcock to represent
her at taxpayer expense and paying for her defense herself would be
financially ruinous.
Babcock has said he’s willing to represent Keller for almost nothing,
but that the Ethics Commission has not clarified whether that was an
ethics violation.
A sworn statement Keller filed with the Texas Ethics Commission last
year did not disclose her ownership interest in seven residential and
commercial properties in Dallas and Tarrant counties. The newspaper
said those properties are valued at roughly $1.9 million.
Among Keller’s unlisted properties are two Dallas homes valued
together at just over $1 million. Keller is listed as sole owner
under Sharon Batjer, her married name. She divorced in 1982. Another
omission is commercial land next to Keller’s Drive-In, a landmark
Dallas hamburger restaurant operated since 1965 by the judge’s
father, Jack.
Keller’s Ethics Commission filing listed income of more than
$275,000, including her annual salary of $152,500. County tax records
valued properties she did claim, including her Austin home, at
roughly $1 million.
At least some of the properties missing on Keller’s disclosure forms
had been listed several years ago, but were inadvertently dropped,
Shack said.
Failing to file in compliance with personal financial disclosure laws
can bring fines up to $10,000. County Attorney David Escamilla could
also seek Class B misdemeanor charges that carry up to six months in
jail and $2,000 in fines.
Shack said he was still reviewing Keller’s financial disclosures and
did not know if filing new ones would allow her to avoid any fines.
Texans for Public Justice Director Craig McDonald said Keller is
hiding her assets while asking taxpayers to pay her legal bills.
“Unlike many of the defendants who have appeared before her, Keller
can afford to hire a top-notch attorney,” McDonald said.
Keller has been on the court since 1994.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/6352587.html