Judge charged with blocking execution appeal



By JACKIE STONE Associated Press Writer © 2009 The Associated Press
Feb. 19, 2009, 3:54PM

AUSTIN, Texas — A Texas judicial commission filed proceedings 
Thursday against the presiding judge of the state Court of Criminal 
Appeals charging her with improperly cutting off appeals for a 
condemned inmate the night of his execution.
The action by the Texas Commission on Judicial Conduct against Sharon 
Keller, the court's presiding judge, could result in her removal from 
office.
Convicted killer Michael Richard was put to death the evening of 
Sept. 25, 2007, after Keller ordered a clerk to close the court's 
office promptly at 5 p.m. Lawyers for Richard had requested that the 
office stay open to permit a late appeal.
Keller had no comment on the commission's action, her office said 
Thursday when contacted by The Associated Press. She has 15 days to 
respond to five charges in the proceedings filed by the judicial 
commission.
Twenty lawyers, including a state legislator and a former appellate 
judge, filed one of the original complaints against Keller to the 
judicial commission accusing her of violating Richard's rights. They 
said Keller improperly cut off appeals even though the U.S. Supreme 
Court had earlier in the day accepted a case on the propriety of 
lethal injection.
The case the Supreme Court accepted had direct implications for 
Richard's execution, the lawyers argued.
The proceedings filed by the commission include more details on 
Keller's behavior the night in question from their investigation.
"I'm impressed that the people on this commission took it serious 
enough, they decided even if you're the presiding judge of the 
highest criminal court in the state that you're still subjected to 
justice," said Jim Harrington, director of the Texas Civil Rights 
Project, which filed the original complaint to the commission.
Richard, 49, was executed for the 1986 rape and fatal shooting of a 
mother of seven. His lawyers had called the state appeals court's 
clerk asking that the office stay open an extra 20 minutes so a 
request to delay the execution could be filed.
Seana Willing, executive director of the judicial commission, said 
the Texas Supreme Court will appoint a special master to hear the 
matter. According to commission documents, the special master is a 
sitting or retired district or appellate judge.
In the trial Keller has the right to counsel; to be confronted by her 
accusers; to introduce evidence; and to examine and cross-examine 
witnesses.
After the proceedings, the commission may adopt, change or reject the 
findings and then issue conclusions. The proceedings may end in 
dismissal, public censure or recommendation of removal. The decision 
is then sent to a review tribunal appointed by the Supreme Court of 
Texas. Only the review tribunal may remove the judge from the bench, 
and that decision could be appealed to the Texas Supreme Court.
"You've never seen this happen, but you've never seen them shut down 
the courthouse like she did, either," Harrington said.

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/ap/tx/6271402.html