Fighting against Death Penalty since 1999
Death Penalty Resources » World and death penalty » Death Penalty in Texas » Questions About an Execution
People should have no illusions about the brutal injustice of the
death penalty after all of the exonerations in recent years from DNA
evidence, but the case of Cameron Todd Willingham is still shocking.
Mr. Willingham was executed for setting a fire that killed his 2-year-
old daughter and 1-year-old twins, but a fire expert hired by the
State of Texas has issued a report casting enormous doubt on whether
the fire was arson at all. The Willingham investigation, which is
continuing, is further evidence that the criminal justice system is
far too flawed to justify imposing a death penalty.
After the fire, investigators decided, based in large part on burn
patterns on the house’s floors, that it was intentionally set.
Prosecutors charged Mr. Willingham, who escaped from the burning
home, with capital murder. Mr. Willingham protested his innocence
until the day the state killed him by lethal injection in 2004.
The following year, Texas created the Forensic Science Commission to
investigate charges of scientific mistakes or misconduct, and the
panel began looking into the Willingham case. It commissioned Craig
Beyler, a nationally recognized fire expert, to examine evidence.
Mr. Beyler issued a report last week that painted an ugly picture of
what passes for expert scientific investigation and testimony in a
capital case in Texas. The report found that the official inquiry
into the Willingham fire did not meet prevailing scientific standards
of the time, much less current ones.
The investigators “had poor understandings of fire science,” Mr.
Beyler said, and their “methodologies did not comport with the
scientific method.” He determined that the opinions of one main
investigator were “nothing more than a collection of personal beliefs
that have nothing to do with science-based fire investigation.”
The report concluded that a “finding of arson could not be
sustained.” The Forensic Science Commission is now asking the state
fire marshal’s office for its response. It anticipates issuing a
final report next year.
The commission is to be commended for conducting this inquiry, but it
is outrageous that Texas is conducting its careful, highly skilled
investigation after Mr. Willingham has been executed, rather than
before.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/31/opinion/31mon2.html?_r=1